jump to navigation

Forced to Serve Homosexuals! January 10, 2007

Posted by Winter in queer politics.

Gay civil partnerships went through in the UK with barely a whimper, but it seems that the real test has come with the Goods and Services Act which is designed to prevent organisations offering public services from discriminating against anyone.

In terms of gay people, this basically means that if you’re running a hotel and you hire out double rooms to heterosexual couples, you have to hire out double rooms to gay couples as well. You will not be allowed to discriminate on the basis of your customers’ sexual orientations.

From the Guardian.

The sexual orientation regulations, which came into force in Northern Ireland on January 1 and will apply in England and Wales from April, require organisations to treat gay and lesbian people just as they would treat anyone else. Discrimination on the grounds of race, gender or religion is already disallowed, and the change in the law is a sensible recognition of a form of equality which already been accepted by parliament in everything from a single age of consent to civil partnerships.

The act has whipped up nasty homophobic backlash with the Daily Mail and various faith groups in the lead, spreading some outrageous stories about the Act’s implications.

Polly Toynbee on the homophobic panic:

Get one thing clear: this law does not stop religions from banning gays joining their congregations or becoming priests. (Though they don’t seem to be very good at it.) But it does oblige any organisation or business offering services to the public to offer them equally to all comers. Bizarre and repugnant ads in newspapers from Christian organisers have spread outright lies about what this law does. Their campaign, strongly supported by the Daily Mail, has whipped up a degree of homophobia still lurking under an apparently tolerant surface. The gay rights group Stonewall has been horrified at the resurgence of threats and obscene abuse.

To make their case, the religious have struggled to think up extreme scenarios where the law might affect them, but each has proved to be wrong, as ministers have refuted them all. They claim the law will “force all schools to actively promote homosexual civil partnerships to children (from primary-school age) to the same degree that they teach the importance of marriage”. No it won’t: the curriculum does not “actively promote” homosexuality, nor even make sex education compulsory. They claim the law will “force a printing shop run by a Christian to print fliers promoting gay sex”. No it won’t, unless the same printers promote heterosexual porn too. Or how about this one? “Force a family-run B&B to let out a double room to a transsexual couple, even if the family think it in the best interests of their children to refuse to allow such a situation in their home.” Oh no it won’t: it doesn’t even cover transsexuals – and what a daft scenario anyway. The National Secular Society has complained to the Advertising Standards Authority. But on and on go the prurient situations the religious homophobes dream up. The Christian Concern for Our Nation, petitioning the Queen, claims they “love their neighbours”, but “Christians, of course, earnestly desire the repentance and salvation of homosexuals”.

Read the rest.

They had themselves a protest outside Parliament too.

I couldn’t give a shit about the feelings of people who base their homophobia on their religion. If you claim to be offering services to the public, you have to accept that the public includes a lot of lesbian, gay and bisexual people, just as I would have to accept that the public includes homophobic religious people. If you don’t want to offer services to the lesbian, gay and bisexual public then, in my humble opinion, you shouldn’t be offering services and you certainly should not be getting any public funding.

This homophobic backlash makes me even more concerned than I already was by the Government’s push to farm out more public social and educational services to faith-based organisations.



1. TP - January 10, 2007

“This homophobic backlash makes me even more concerned than I already was by the Government’s push to farm out more public social and educational services to faith-based organisations.”

It was good to hear today though that the opositions have been overthrown and the law will go ahead as planned!

2. Winter - January 10, 2007

Oh yeah, I should have added that!

3. Anonymous - January 11, 2007

I was just about to quote the same bit as TP! I’m really worried about this too – especially when it’s combined with business – did you see the documentary on the Reg Vardy school where they teach creationism in science lessons? He can get away with pushing his religious beliefs on kids because he has the money to provide top quality resources and the government is more worried about style than substance. Grrrrrr.

It’s sad and scary how widespread homophbia still is 😦

4. Anonymous - January 18, 2007

excuse my ignorance, but i’m curious to know if there’s any functional equivalent in the uk to our separation of church and state in the us? i know the uk has a state religion (the reason we separated church from state when we started our own government over here) but is there any other type of safeguard to protect people from government encroachment on or support of religious beliefs and practices: ie, essentially sanctioning discrimination if based on religious beliefs? i know you’re all leagues ahead of us over here in terms of civil liberties and queer rights, and maybe the cultures are so different that this isn’t an issue of the same magnitude there as it is here. just wondering.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: